COMPARISON OF METHODOLOGIES FOR CONTINUOUS, AUTOMATIC EMISSION DUST MONITORING
Oct 06 2014
Author: Roland Zepeck on behalf of CEM
Introduction
Automatic monitoring for particulates in gaseous medias is a special challenge, as the required answer from the monitors is a signal of Concentration, however, the matter to be detected is a mixture of two phases (stack gas = gaseous phase, particulates = solid phase), and such a mixture never can be ideal. Therefore in-situ methods avoiding the extraction of sample gas for measurement have a significant advantage over extractive methods. For extractive methods (including the reference method Isokinetic Gravimetric Sampling) the position of the extraction point (= representative point) is of vital importance for the accuracy of the measurement.
For automatic monitoring various methodologies are available. In general they can be grouped into several, partially also overlapping, groups:
Qualitative and Quantitative Methods
In-situ and Extractive Methods
Electrical and Optical Methods
Optical methods can be sub-grouped into Light-Transmission and Light-Scattering Methods.
Digital Edition
Asian Environmental Technology 27.2 - April/May 2023
May 2023
In This Edition Business News - Celebrating The Life Of A Gas Measurement Industry Icon - A New Home For Gas Sensor Specialists - Envea Completes The Acquisition Of Hycontrol Ltd Environ...
View all digital editions
Events
Jul 02 2023 Albena, Bulgaria
Jul 04 2023 Cardiff, UK
Jul 05 2023 Johannesburg, South Africa
Jul 11 2023 Shanghai, China
Jul 11 2023 Lagos, Nigeria